Conjunctures of Democracy Erosion: Is Brazil a Global Paradigm of Resilience?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v21i110.7856Resumo
The paper aims to examine and understand the recent developments in Brazilian democracy in a sociological perspective. It offers an analysis of the conjunctural preconditions for the recent rise of authoritarian populism, presenting ways in which Brazil can be viewed as paradigm of democratic erosion and/or resilience. The article describes the foundational premises that made the development of contemporary democracies possible, and it proceeds from this description to explain how features common to authoritarian populist movements in Brazil and elsewhere are detrimental to these premises. It is argued that democracies are likely to thrive when welfare provisions and access to human rights are open to increasing sectors of the population, generating an inclusionary citizenship effect. The political polarization regarding the Brazilian welfare system and the discourse against international human rights, culminated in the weakening of the Brazilian welfare net and setbacks in the recognition of human rights by courts. These processes preceded, and were aggravated by, the rise of authoritarian populism in Brazil, generating an exclusionary view of citizenship that tended to intensify social conflict, with increasing militarization at both governmental and social levels. Arguably, the absence of warfare or an imminent warfare threat in the most recent democratic transition in Brazil reduced the capacity of welfare and constitutional human rights provisions to limit the influence of the military on democracy. While the efforts to build up the welfare system and protect human rights are still ongoing, the militarization element remains latent, posing a constant threat to democratic consolidation in Brazil.
Downloads
Referências
ADGHIRNI, Samy. Brazil’s OECD bid under scrutiny after Bolsonaro allegations. Bloomberg, New York, 6 May 2020, 17h28. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-06/brazil-s-oecd-bid-under-scrutiny-after-bolsonaro-allegations. Accessed on: 10 October 2021.
BEETHAM, David. Democracy: a beginner’s guide. London: Oneworld Publications, 2012.
BOLSONARO, Jair Bolsonaro. Discurso do Presidente da República, Jair Bolsonaro, durante Cerimônia de Posse no Congresso Nacional. Brasília, DF: Presidência, 1º January 2019. Available at: http://www.biblioteca.presidencia.gov.br/presidencia/ex-presidentes/bolsonaro/discursos/discurso-do-presidente-da-republica-jair-bolsonaro-durante-cerimonia-de-posse-no-congresso-nacional. Accessed on: 7 October 2021.
BOLSONARO no SIC news: Jair Bolsonaro comenta sobre Força Nacional e invasões em Rondônia. Interviewer: Everton Leoni. Interviewed: Jair Bolsonaro. Canal SIC TV, Porto Velho, 16 June 2021. 1 video (3min.52). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-UtCRj7V2M. Accessed on: 16 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Emenda Constitucional nº 45, de 30 de dezembro de 2004. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, [2004]. Available at: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc45.htm. Accessed on: 16 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Presidência da República. Emendas Constitucionais. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, [2023]. Available at: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/Emendas/Emc/quadro_emc.htm. Accessed on: 16 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). ADI 3540. Rappourter: Celso de Mello, 1º September 2005. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2005]. Available at: http://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=AC&docID=387260. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). ADPF 187. Rappourter: Celso de Mello, 15 June 2011. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2011]. Available at: http://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=5956195. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Habeas Corpus 126.292. Rappourter: Teori Zavascki, 17 February 2016. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2016]. Available at: https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=10964246. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). ADI 3239. Rappourter: Rosa Weber, 13 December 2019. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2018a]. Available at: http://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=749028916. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). AP 937 QO. Rappourter: Roberto Barroso, 3 May 2018. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2018b]. Available at: https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=4776682. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Inq 4.781. Rappourter: Alexandre de Moraes, 19 March 2019. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2019]. Available at: https://www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/cms/noticiaNoticiaStf/anexo/mandado27maio.pdf. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). AP 1060. Rappourter: Alexandre de Moraes, 14 September 2023. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal, [2024]. Available at: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur495737/false. Accessed on: 16 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). ED-AIJE nº 060097243. Rappourter: Floriano de Azevedo Marques, 3 May 2024. Brasília, DF: Superior Tribunal Eleitoral, [2024a]. Available at: https://jurisprudencia.tse.jus.br/. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). ED-AIJE nº 060098627. Rappourter: Floriano De Azevedo Marques, 3 May 2024. Brasília, DF: Superior Tribunal Eleitoral, [2024b]. Available at: https://jurisprudencia.tse.jus.br/. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
BRAZIL. Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE). ED-RepEsp nº 060098457. Rappourter: Floriano De Azevedo Marques, 3 May 2024. Brasília, DF: Superior Tribunal Eleitoral, [2024c]. Available at: https://jurisprudencia.tse.jus.br/. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
DRYZEK, John; GOODIN, Robert E. Risk-sharing and social justice: the motivational foundations of the post-war welfare state. British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-34, 1986.
DUDZIAK, Mary L. Desegregation as a cold war imperative. Stanford Law Review, Santa Clara, v. 41, n. 1, 61-120, 1988.
ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT. Democracy index 2023: age of conflict. [S. l.]: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2024. E-book. Available at: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/. Accessed on: 12 March 2024.
FORSTHOFF, Ernst (Ed.). Rechtsstaatlichkeit und sozialstaatlichkeit: aufsätze und essays. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968.
GALLEGO, Esther Solano. Quem é o inimigo? Retóricas de inimizade nas redes sociais no período 2014-2017. In: PINHEIRO-MACHADO, Rosana; FEIXO, Adriano de (eds.). Brasil em transe: bolsonarismo, nova direita e desdemocratização. Rio de Janeiro: Oficina Raquel, 2019. p. 96-113.
GINSBURG, Tom; HUQ, Aziz Z. How to save a constitutional democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. The third wave: democratization in the late 20th century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
IACHR. Situation of human rights in Brazil: approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on February 12, 2021. OEA/SER. L/V/II, doc. 9, [s. l], 12 February 2021. Available at: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/Brasil2021-en.pdf. Accessed on: 8 October 2021.
IDEA. The global state of democracy 2023: the new checks and balance. Strömsborg: International IDEA, 2023. DOI 10.31752/idea.2023.78. Available at: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/2024-02/the-global-state-of-democracy-2023-the-new-checks-and-balances.pdf. Accessed on: 12 March 2024.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. Convention 169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169). Available at: https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:55:0::NO::P55_TYPE,P55_LANG,P55_DOCUMENT,P55_NODE:REV,en,C169,/Document. Accessed on: 15 May 2024.
JENSEN, Steven L.B. The making of international human rights: the 1960s, decolonization and the reconstruction of global values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
LAUREN, Paul Gordon. First principles of racial equality: history and the politics and diplomacy of human rights provisions in the United Nations charter. Human Rights Quarterly, Baltimore, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1983.
LAYTON, Azza Salama. International politics and civil rights policies in the United States, 1941-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
LOCKWOOD, Bert B. The United Nations charter and united states civil rights litigation: 1946-1955. Iowa Law Review, Iowa city, v. 69, p. 901-956, 1984.
PARKER, Richard D. Here, the people rule: a constitutional populist manifesto. Valparaiso University Law Review, Valparaiso, v. 27, n. 3, p. 531-54, 1993.
PIKART, Eberhard; WERNER, Wolfram (Eds.). Der parlamentarische rat, 1948–1949: akten und protokolle. Boppard am Rhein: Harald Boldt, 1993. 5 v.
PINHEIRO, Danielle Sandi. Gasto social federal e melhoria da qualidade de vida no contexto do modelo orçamentário brasileiro. Boletim Regional, Urbano e Ambiental, Brasília, v. 5, p. 19-28, June 2011.
PRZEWORSKI, Adam. Crisis of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
SCHOFER, Evan; MEYER, John W. The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, Amherst, v. 70, n. 6, p. 898-920, 2005.
SENADO FEDERAL. Siga Brasil: painel especialista [dataset]. Version 8 October 2021. Available at: http://www9.senado.leg.br/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc.htm?document=Senado%2FSigaBrasilPainelEspecialista.qvw&host=QVS%40www9&anonymous=true&select=LB137,2019. Accessed on: 8 October 2021.
SKRENTNY, David John. The effect of the cold war on african-american civil rights: america and the world audience, 1945-1968. Theory and Society, v. 27, p. 237-285, 1998.
SOUZA, Souza. A elite do atraso: da escravidão a Lava Jato. Rio de Janeiro: Leya, 2017.
THORNHILL, Chris. Democracies without War: Effects of War as a Determinant of Populism. In: Gouvêa, Carina Barbosa; Villas Bôas, Pedro Hermílio (eds.). State of exception: populism and the militarization of politics in the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Belo Horizonte: Editora Letramento, 2022. p. 89-112.
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. Brazilian institutions and society must act to save democracy and the fight against corruption. Transparency International, [s. l.], 25 April 2020. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/press/brazilian-institutions-and-society-must-act-to-save-democracy-and-the-fight-against-corruption. Accessed on: 10 October 2021.
TUSHNET, Mark. Taking the constitution away from the Courts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997.
UNITED KINGDOM. Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act. UK: UK Public General Acts, 2022 c. 32. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/32/contents. Accessed on: 16 May 2024.
V-DEM INSTITUTE. Democracy report 2024: democracy winning and losing at the ballot. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, 2024. E-book. Available at: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/43/v-dem_dr2024_lowres.pdf. Accessed on: 12 March 2024.
VILELA, Pedro Rafael. Bolsonaro diz que Brasil pode sair da OMS: Presidente fez críticas ao trabalho da organização na pandemia. Agência Brasil EBC, Brasília, 5 June 2020, 20h58. Available at: https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/politica/noticia/2020-06/bolsonaro-diz-que-brasil-pode-sair-da-oms. Accessed on: 10 October 2021.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Direito Público

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O(s)/A(s) autores(as) dos manuscritos submetidos concorda(m) com as regras a seguir:
1) Todos os autores e autoras participaram do trabalho, são responsáveis pelas ideias e conceitos nele emitidos e atestam sua conformidade com os princípios éticos exigidos.
2) Todos os autores e autoras concordam com a forma final do trabalho e em ceder os direitos para publicação nos canais de publicação da Escola de Direito do IDP.
3) Todos os autores e autoras informam que o manuscrito é de sua autoria e assumem a responsabilidade pelo trabalho, declarando que a obra a ser publicada não infringe quaisquer direitos de propriedade intelectual de terceiros.
3.1) Em caso de submissão simultânea, além da reprovação imediata do artigo e comunicação ao(s) respectivo(s) periódico(s), a Revista Direito Público se reserva o direito de não receber novas submissões de todos os autores implicados pelo prazo de 2 (dois) anos, contado a partir da data de ciência do fato.
4) Todos os autores e autoras autoriza(m) a edição de seu trabalho e cede(m) à Escola de Direito do IDP os direitos de autor para reproduzir, editar e publicar ou veicular o citado trabalho em qualquer forma midiática, resguardada a autoria, em particular sob forma digital, em arquivo eletrônico online na Internet, bem como armazená-los em seu repositório de acordo com o desenvolvimento do processo editorial. Esta concessão não terá caráter oneroso para a Escola de Direito do IDP, não havendo remuneração sob qualquer modalidade pela utilização do referido material, tendo este o caráter de colaboração científica.